Oxygenation management during veno-arterial ECMO support for cardiogenic shock: a multicentric retrospective cohort study.

BACKGOUND: Hyperoxemia is common and associated with poor outcome during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock. However, little is known about practical daily management of oxygenation. Then, we aim to describe sweep gas oxygen fraction (FSO2), postoxygenator oxygen partial pressure (PPOSTO2), inspired oxygen fraction (FIO2), and right radial arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) between day 1 and day 7 of peripheral VA ECMO support. We also aim to evaluate the association between oxygenation parameters and outcome. In this retrospective multicentric study, each participating center had to report data on the last 10 eligible patients for whom the ICU stay was terminated. Patients with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Primary endpoint was individual mean FSO2 during the seven first days of ECMO support (FSO2 mean (day 1-7)). RESULTS: Between August 2019 and March 2022, 139 patients were enrolled in 14 ECMO centers in France, and one in Switzerland. Among them, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1-7) was 70 [57; 79] % but varied according to center case volume. Compared to high volume centers, centers with less than 30 VA-ECMO runs per year were more likely to maintain FSO2 ≥ 70% (OR 5.04, CI 95% [1.39; 20.4], p = 0.017). Median value for right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-7) was 114 [92; 145] mmHg, and decreased from 125 [86; 207] mmHg at day 1, to 97 [81; 133] mmHg at day 3 (p < 0.01). Severe hyperoxemia (i.e. right radial PaO2 ≥ 300 mmHg) occurred in 16 patients (12%). PPOSTO2, a surrogate of the lower body oxygenation, was measured in only 39 patients (28%) among four centers. The median value of PPOSTO2 mean (day 1-7) value was 198 [169; 231] mmHg. By multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.07, CI95% [1.03-1.11], p < 0.001), FSO2 mean (day 1-3)(OR 1.03 [1.00-1.06], p = 0.039), and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-3) (OR 1.03, CI95% [1.00-1.02], p = 0.023) were associated with in-ICU mortality. CONCLUSION: In a multicentric cohort of cardiogenic shock supported by VA ECMO, the median value for FSO2 mean (day 1-7) was 70 [57; 79] %. PPOSTO2 monitoring was infrequent and revealed significant hyperoxemia. Higher FSO2 mean (day 1-3) and right radial PaO2 mean (day 1-3) were independently associated with in-ICU mortality.

Comparison of mortality and outcomes of four respiratory viruses in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the mortality and burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV group), SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19 group), non-H1N1 (Seasonal influenza group) and H1N1 influenza (H1N1 group) in adult patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory failure. A total of 807 patients were included. Mortality was compared between the four following groups: RSV, COVID-19, seasonal influenza, and H1N1 groups. Patients in the RSV group had significantly more comorbidities than the other patients. At admission, patients in the COVID-19 group were significantly less severe than the others according to the simplified acute physiology score-2 (SAPS-II) and sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. Using competing risk regression, COVID-19 (sHR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.10; 2.36) and H1N1 (sHR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.20; 2.93) were associated with a statistically significant higher mortality while seasonal influenza was not (sHR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.65; 1.31), when compared to RSV. Despite occurring in more severe patients, RSV and seasonal influenza group appear to be associated with a more favorable outcome than COVID-19 and H1N1 groups.

Use of Aprotinin versus Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery Patients with High-Risk for Excessive Bleeding (APACHE) trial: a multicentre retrospective comparative non-randomized historical study.

OBJECTIVES: Following the reintroduction of aprotinin into the European market, the French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists recommended its prophylactic use at half-dose for high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We examined whether the use of aprotinin instead of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce severe perioperative bleeding. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, historical study included cardiac surgery patients treated with aprotinin or tranexamic acid between December 2017 and September 2020. The primary efficacy end point was the severe or massive perioperative bleeding (class 3-4 of the universal definition of perioperative bleeding). The safety secondary end points included the occurrence of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 693 patients included in the study, 347 received aprotinin and 346 took tranexamic acid. The percentage of patients with severe or massive bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (42.1% vs 43.6%, Adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.23, P = 0.44), as was the perioperative need for blood products (81.0% vs 83.2%, ORadj = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.17, P = 0.20). However, the median (Interquartile range) 12 h postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group (383 ml [241-625] vs 450 ml [290-730], P < 0.01). Compared to tranexamic acid, the intraoperative use of aprotinin was associated with increased risk for thromboembolic events (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.30 [95% Cl: 1.06-5.30]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Given the modest reduction in blood loss at the expense of a significant increase in thromboembolic adverse events, aprotinin use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients should be based on a carefully considered benefit-risk assessment.

Prognostic value of capillary refill time in adult patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Acute circulatory failure leads to tissue hypoperfusion. Capillary refill time (CRT) has been widely studied, but its predictive value remains debated. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the ability of CRT to predict death or adverse events in a context at risk or confirmed acute circulatory failure in adults. METHOD: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google scholar databases were screened for relevant studies. The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC ROC), sensitivity, specificity, threshold, and diagnostic odds ratio using a random-effects model were determined. The primary analysis was the ability of abnormal CRT to predict death in patients with acute circulatory failure. Secondary analysis included the ability of CRT to predict death or adverse events in patients at risk or with confirmed acute circulatory failure, the comparison with lactate, and the identification of explanatory factors associated with better accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 60,656 patients in 23 studies were included. Concerning the primary analysis, the pooled AUC ROC of 13 studies was 0.66 (95%CI [0.59; 0.76]), and pooled sensitivity was 54% (95%CI [43; 64]). The pooled specificity was 72% (95%CI [55; 84]). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 3.4 (95%CI [1.4; 8.3]). Concerning the secondary analysis, the pooled AUC ROC of 23 studies was 0.69 (95%CI [0.65; 0.74]). The prognostic value of CRT compared to lactate was not significantly different. High-quality CRT was associated with a greater accuracy. CONCLUSION: CRT poorly predicted death and adverse events in patients at risk or established acute circulatory failure. Its accuracy is greater when high-quality CRT measurement is performed.

ESAIC focused guideline for the use of cardiac biomarkers in perioperative risk evaluation

In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the use of cardiac biomarkers in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The aim of this focused guideline was to provide updated guidance regarding the pre-, post- and combined pre-and postoperative use of cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptides in adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The guidelines were prepared using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This included the definition of critical outcomes, a systematic literature search, appraisal of certainty of evidence, evaluation of biomarker measurement in terms of the balance of desirable and undesirable effects including clinical outcomes, resource use, health inequality, stakeholder acceptance, and implementation. The panel differentiated between three different scopes of applications: cardiac biomarkers as prognostic factors, as tools for risk prediction, and for biomarker-enhanced management strategies. In a modified Delphi process, the task force defined 12 critical outcomes. The systematic literature search resulted in over 25,000 hits, of which 115 full-text articles formed the body of evidence for recommendations. The evidence appraisal indicated heterogeneity in the certainty of evidence across critical outcomes. Further, there was relevant gradient in the certainty of evidence across the three scopes of application. Recommendations were issued and if this was not possible due to limited evidence, clinical practice statements were produced. The ESAIC focused guidelines provide guidance on the perioperative use of cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptides in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, for three different scopes of application.

Overview of the current use of levosimendan in France: a prospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Following the results of randomized controlled trials on levosimendan, French health authorities requested an update of the current use and side-effects of this medication on a national scale. METHOD: The France-LEVO registry was a prospective observational cohort study reflecting the indications, dosing regimens, and side-effects of levosimendan, as well as patient outcomes over a year. RESULTS: The patients included (n = 602) represented 29.6% of the national yearly use of levosimendan in France. They were treated for cardiogenic shock (n = 250, 41.5%), decompensated heart failure (n = 127, 21.1%), cardiac surgery-related low cardiac output prophylaxis and/or treatment (n = 86, 14.3%), and weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 82, 13.6%). They received 0.18 ± 0.07 µg/kg/min levosimendan over 26 ± 8 h. An initial bolus was administered in 45 patients (7.5%), 103 (17.1%) received repeated infusions, and 461 (76.6%) received inotropes and or vasoactive agents concomitantly. Hypotension was reported in 218 patients (36.2%), atrial fibrillation in 85 (14.1%), and serious adverse events in 17 (2.8%). 136 patients (22.6%) died in hospital, and 26 (4.3%) during the 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that levosimendan was used in accordance with recent recommendations by French physicians. Hypotension and atrial fibrillation remained the most frequent side-effects, while serious adverse event potentially attributable to levosimendan were infrequent. The results suggest that this medication was safe and potentially associated with some benefit in the population studied.

Lower Limb Ischemia in Surgical Femoral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the incidence, clinical impact on survival, and risk factors of lower limb ischemia (LLI) of surgical peripheral femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) in the current era. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the authors' institutional database of VA ECMO was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence of LLI. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. Risk factors of LLI were searched with multivariate analyses. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients receiving peripheral VA ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From January 2018 to December 2021, 188 patients (mean age: 52.0 ± 14.1 years; 63.8% male, 36.2% female) received peripheral VA ECMO. Male sex was more prevalent in the group without LLI (65.9% v 33.3%; p = 0.031). Twelve (6.4%) patients developed LLI during VA ECMO support (n = 6) or after VA ECMO removal (n = 6). Survival to hospital discharge was not statistically different between patients with and without LLI (50.0% v 48.3%; p = 0.571). Female sex patients were at increased risk for LLI (odds ratio 4.38, 95% CI 1.21-15.81; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral femoral VA ECMO through a surgical approach is associated with a low LLI rate, which does not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality. The female sex is an independent risk factor for LLI.

ESAIC focused guideline for the use of cardiac biomarkers in perioperative risk evaluation.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the use of cardiac biomarkers in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. AIMS: The aim of this focused guideline was to provide updated guidance regarding the pre-, post- and combined pre-and postoperative use of cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptides in adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS: The guidelines were prepared using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This included the definition of critical outcomes, a systematic literature search, appraisal of certainty of evidence, evaluation of biomarker measurement in terms of the balance of desirable and undesirable effects including clinical outcomes, resource use, health inequality, stakeholder acceptance, and implementation. The panel differentiated between three different scopes of applications: cardiac biomarkers as prognostic factors, as tools for risk prediction, and for biomarker-enhanced management strategies. RESULTS: In a modified Delphi process, the task force defined 12 critical outcomes. The systematic literature search resulted in over 25,000 hits, of which 115 full-text articles formed the body of evidence for recommendations. The evidence appraisal indicated heterogeneity in the certainty of evidence across critical outcomes. Further, there was relevant gradient in the certainty of evidence across the three scopes of application. Recommendations were issued and if this was not possible due to limited evidence, clinical practice statements were produced. CONCLUSION: The ESAIC focused guidelines provide guidance on the perioperative use of cardiac troponin and B-type natriuretic peptides in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, for three different scopes of application.

Reliability and reproducibility of the DICART device to assess capillary refill time: a bench and in-silico study.

Capillary refill time (CRT) is an important indicator of peripheral perfusion with a strong prognostic value, but it is sensitive to environmental factors and numerous measurement methods are reported in the litterature. DiCARTECH has developed a device that assesses CRT. We sought to investigate the robustness of the device and the reproducibility of the algorithm in a bench and in-silico study. We used the video acquired from a previous clinical study on healthy volunteers. For the bench study, the measurement process was performed by a robotic system piloted by a computer that analyzed 250 times nine previously acquired videos. For the in-silico study, we used 222 videos to test the algorithm's robustness. We created 30 videos from each video with a large blind spot and used the "color jitter" function to create a hundred videos from each video. In the bench study, the coefficient of variation was 11% (95%CI: 9-13). The correlation with human-measured CRT was good (R2 = 0.91, P < 0.001). In the in-silico study, for the blind spotted video, the coefficient of variation was 13% (95%CI: 10-17). For the color-jitter modified video the coefficient of variation was 62% (95%CI: 55-70). We confirmed the ability of the DiCART™ II device to perform multiple measurements without mechanical or electronic dysfunction. The precision and reproducibility of the algorithm are compatible with the assessment of clinical small changes in CRT.

A Multimodal Cardioprotection Strategy During Cardiac Surgery: The ProCCard Study.

OBJECTIVE: The ProCCard study tested whether combining several cardioprotective interventions would reduce the myocardial and other biological and clinical damage in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Multicenter tertiary care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 210 patients scheduled to undergo aortic valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A control group (standard of care) was compared to a treated group combining five perioperative cardioprotective techniques: anesthesia with sevoflurane, remote ischemic preconditioning, close intraoperative blood glucose control, moderate respiratory acidosis (pH 7.30) just before aortic unclamping (concept of the "pH paradox"), and gentle reperfusion just after aortic unclamping. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the postoperative 72-h area under the curve (AUC) for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hsTnI). Secondary endpoints were biological markers and clinical events occurring during the 30 postoperative days and the prespecified subgroup analyses. The linear relationship between the 72-h AUC for hsTnI and aortic clamping time, significant in both groups (p < 0.0001), was not modified by the treatment (p = 0.57). The rate of adverse events at 30 days was identical. A non-significant reduction of the 72-h AUC for hsTnI (-24%, p = 0.15) was observed when sevoflurane was administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (46% of patients in the treated group). The incidence of postoperative renal failure was not reduced (p = 0.104). CONCLUSION: This multimodal cardioprotection has not demonstrated any biological or clinical benefit during cardiac surgery. The cardio- and reno-protective effects of sevoflurane and remote ischemic preconditioning therefore remain to be demonstrated in this context.

Hemodynamic Effects of Awake Prone Positioning With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Failure.

INTRODUCTION: Awake prone positioning (PP) reduces need for intubation for patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure. We investigated the hemodynamic effects of awake PP in non-ventilated subjects with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study. Adult hypoxemic subjects with COVID-19 not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation receiving at least one PP session were included. Hemodynamic assessment was done with transthoracic echocardiography before, during, and after a PP session. RESULTS: Twenty-six subjects were included. We observed a significant and reversible increase in cardiac index (CI) during PP compared to supine position (SP): 3.0 ± 0.8 L/min/m2 in PP, 2.5 ± 0.6 L/min/m2 before PP (SP1), and 2.6 ± 0.5 L/min/m2 after PP (SP2, P < .001). A significant improvement in right ventricular (RV) systolic function was also evidenced during PP: The RV fractional area change was 36 ± 10% in SP1, 46 ± 10% during PP, and 35 ± 8% in SP2 (P < .001). There was no significant difference in PaO2 /FIO2 and breathing frequency. CONCLUSION: CI and RV systolic function are improved by awake PP in non-ventilated subjects with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure.

Comparison of landiolol and amiodarone for the treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (FAAC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) after cardiac surgery has a high incidence of 30%, but its management is controversial. Two strategies are recommended without evidence of a superiority of one against the other: rate control with beta-blocker or rhythm control with amiodarone. Landiolol is a new-generation beta-blocker with fast onset and short half-life. One retrospective, single-center study compared landiolol to amiodarone for PoAF after cardiac surgery with a better hemodynamic stability and a higher rate of reduction to sinus rhythm with landiolol, justifying the need for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Our aim is to compare landiolol to amiodarone in the setting of PoAF after cardiac surgery with the hypothesis of a higher rate of reduction to sinus rhythm with landiolol during the 48 h after the first episode of POAF. METHODS: The FAAC trial is a multicenter single-blind two parallel-arm randomized study, which planned to include 350 patients with a first episode of PoAF following cardiac surgery. The duration of the study is 2 years. The patients are randomized in two arms: a landiolol group and an amiodarone group. Randomization (Ennov Clinical®) is performed by the anesthesiologist in charge of the patient if PoAF is persistent for at least 30 min after correction of hypovolemia, dyskalemia, and absence of pericardial effusion on a transthoracic echocardiography done at bedside. Our hypothesis is an increase of the percentage of patients in sinus rhythm from 70 to 85% with landiolol in less than 48 h after onset of PoAF (alpha risk = 5%, power = 90%, bilateral test). DISCUSSION: The FAAC trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of EST III with approval number 19.05.08. The FAAC trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing landiolol to amiodarone for PoAF after cardiac surgery. In case of higher rate of reduction with landiolol, this beta-blocker could be the drug of choice used in this context as to reduce the need for anticoagulant therapy and reduce the risk of complications of anticoagulant therapy for patients with a first episode of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04223739. Registered on January 10, 2020.

Central Versus Peripheral Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aortic-to-radial arterial pressure gradient is described during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and can lead to underestimating arterial blood pressure. The authors hypothesized that central arterial pressure monitoring would be associated with lower norepinephrine requirements than radial arterial pressure monitoring during cardiac surgery. DESIGN: An observational prospective cohort with propensity score analysis. SETTING: At a tertiary academic hospital's operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 286 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB (central group: 109; radial group: 177) were enrolled and analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: To explore the hemodynamic effect of the measurement site, the authors divided the cohort into 2 groups according to a femoral/axillary (central group) or radial (radial group) site of arterial pressure monitoring. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the intraoperative amount of norepinephrine administered. Secondary outcomes included norepinephrine-free hours and ICU-free hours at postoperative day 2 (POD2). A logistic model with propensity score analysis was built to predict central arterial pressure monitoring use. The authors compared demographic, hemodynamic, and outcomes data before and after adjustment. Central group patients had a higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. (EuroSCORE) compared to the radial group-7.9 ± 14.0 versus 3.8 ± 7.0, p < 0.001. After adjustment, both groups had similar patient EuroSCORE and arterial blood pressure levels. Intraoperative norepinephrine dose regimens were 0.10 ± 0.10 µg/kg/min in the central group and 0.11 ± 0.11 µg/kg/min in the radial group (p = 0.519). Norepinephrine-free hours at POD2 were 38 ± 17 hours versus 33 ± 19 hours in central and radial groups, respectively (p = 0.034). The ICU-free hours at POD2 were greater in the central group: 18 ± 13 hours versus 13 ± 13 hours, p = 0.008. Adverse events were less frequent in the central group than in the radial group-67% versus 50%, p = 0.007. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the norepinephrine dose regimen were found according to the arterial measurement site during cardiac surgery. However, norepinephrine use and length of stay in the ICU were shorter, and adverse events were decreased when central arterial pressure monitoring was used.

Advantages and limitations of noninvasive devices for cardiac output monitoring: a literature review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Individualized hemodynamic optimization often requires cardiac output monitoring, mostly for goal-directed therapy in the operating room and fluid responsiveness assessment in the intensive care unit. Different technologies for noninvasive cardiac output determination have become available over the recent years. It is therefore crucial for care providers to be made aware of the advantages and limitations of those different devices for an appropriate use at the bedside. RECENT FINDINGS: Nowadays, different noninvasive technologies exist, each with their advantages and limitations, but none are considered interchangeable with bolus thermodilution. Different clinical studies however, emphasize that the trending ability of such devices allows to guide decisions from care providers, and that their use may be associated with improved prognosis, especially in the operating room. Recent studies have also reported their potential use for hemodynamic optimization in specific populations. SUMMARY: Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring may have a clinical impact on patient outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate their clinical relevance, notably in the intensive care unit. Noninvasive monitoring opens up the possibility for hemodynamic optimization in specific or low-risk populations, the benefit of which remains to be assessed.